Wyckoff Schematics #1 vs #2 — Bob Evans Variants
Robert Evans' Two Variants

Schematic #1 vs #2

Wyckoff is a framework, not a stencil. Robert Evans formalized two distinct accumulation patterns — Schematic #1 with the dramatic Spring, and Schematic #2 without one. Most retail traders only know #1, then misread every #2 setup as a failed pattern.

"The market doesn't owe you a Spring. Sometimes the cause is built quietly." — Robert Evans

The Core Difference

#1 ends with a violent shakeout (Spring/UTAD) below support / above resistance — the Composite Man hunts stop liquidity before reversal.

#2 reverses inside the range without piercing the boundary — supply/demand was already absorbed during Phase B, no shakeout needed. Less obvious but often stronger.

Schematic

#1 — With Shakeout

Classic
Defining Features
Schematic

#2 — Without Shakeout

Stealth
Defining Features

Side-by-Side Differentiation

Eight criteria that distinguish #1 from #2 in real time.

Criterion Schematic #1 (Shakeout) Schematic #2 (No Shakeout)
Phase C signatureSpring / UTAD pierces range boundaryMild ST that holds inside the range
Volume on Phase CHigh volume during shakeoutLow/diminishing — no climactic event
Underlying strengthStronger supply/demand to flush outAlready absorbed in Phase B
Detection difficultyEasier — dramatic Phase C eventHarder — no clear "tell"
Best entry setupSpring / UTAD direct entry (Phase C)LPS / LPSY entry (Phase D)
Stop loss placementTight — below Spring / above UTADWider — beyond range boundary
Typical R:R3.5–6.0R (tight stop)2.5–4.0R (wider stop)
Frequency~60% of textbook patterns~40% — often ignored by retail

Live Schematic Identifier

INTERACTIVE

Check what you observe on the chart. The identifier weighs the evidence and tells you which schematic you're likely looking at.

Identifier Verdict

Schematic #1 (Shakeout)
Schematic #2 (No Shakeout)

When Does Each Appear?

Market context determines whether the Composite Man needs to shake retail out.

#1 Appears When…

  • Retail sentiment is strongly opposite (lots of stops to hunt)
  • Range is wide and sloppy with multiple ST tests
  • Higher timeframe is choppy / counter-trend
  • Macro environment creates fear/euphoria extremes
  • Smart money needs final supply transfer before markup

#2 Appears When…

  • Higher timeframe is already trending in setup direction
  • Phase B was extended (cause already built)
  • Range narrows progressively (volatility compression)
  • Retail is already onside (no stops to hunt below/above)
  • Re-Accumulation / Re-Distribution context (mid-trend)

Trade Setup Implications

Each schematic favors different entries from the Setups Playbook.

Schematic #1 — Recommended Entries
Spring / UTAD direct (Phase C) Best
Spring/UTAD Test entry Strong
LPS / LPSY (Phase D) Good
JAC / FTI breakout OK
Schematic #2 — Recommended Entries
LPS / LPSY (Phase D) Best
BUEC / BUEI pullback Best
JAC / FTI breakout Strong
Spring / UTAD direct Skip

No shakeout = no Spring entry to take. Wait for SOS/SOW + LPS/LPSY.

Test Your Understanding

4 questions — instant feedback, no scoring stored.